|
![]() | ||||||||||
![]() |
Home | | About Us | | Water Planning | |
Groundwater | |
Conservation | |
Environmental Flows | |
Drought Mgmt. | |
Resources | |
Search | | ![]() |
![]() |
![]()
|
![]() |
![]() Lower Guadalupe River Project (Update: November 2005) The San Antonio Water System (SAWS) decided in August 2005 that it no longer intended to participate in the controversial Lower Guadalupe Water Supply Project. The water from this project was originally intended for San Antonio-area residents and SAWS had been responsible for 89 percent of the costs. In response, the Guadalupe Blanco River Authority announced that it would reconfigure the project, with the intention of selling the water to the rapidly suburbanizing counties in the upper end of the Guadalupe Basin. The river authority does not plan to include groundwater from the Victoria area in the project as the groundwater withdrawals had generated vocal opposition from area landowners. A smaller project, dependant entirely on water from the Guadalupe River, could still have serious impacts on San Antonio Bay, the whooping crane, and the multi-million dollar recreational and commercial fishing industries the bay system supports. Please see Environmental Concerns below for more information on these concerns. Background (November 2002) The proposed Lower Guadalupe River Project is an effort of the Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority (GBRA), the San Antonio River Authority (SARA), and the San Antonio Water System (SAWS). This project, as initially proposed, would transfer an estimated 94,500 acre-feet of water per year from the mouth of the Guadalupe River to Bexar County via a 120-mile pipeline. There have been subsequent references to larger amounts of water. Since the water from this project would be used primarily for municipal purposes, it must be available as firm yield (available to the municipalities 100% of the time.) In order to provide this guarantee, water would be obtained from several sources including existing surface water rights owned by the GBRA, groundwater from the Gulf Coast aquifer, and the granting of water rights to additional streamflow from the Guadalupe River. The streamflows would be diverted into two 20,000-acre off-channel reservoirs from a location near the Saltwater Barrier, which is just above San Antonio Bay. The water would then be treated and pumped via the pipeline to Bexar County. There are many years during which there might be plenty of water for this project as well as adequate flows to maintain a healthy bay and estuary system. However, during dry and drought years, further reducing already depleted flows would worsen stressful conditions for fish and wildlife that rely on flows from the river. That could be disastrous for the bay system. It also would worsen conditions for the people who earn their living catching or helping others catch or view that fish and wildlife. To learn more, click on a topic: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Environmental Concerns Bays and Estuaries There is reason to be concerned about the impacts of reduced freshwater inflows to the San Antonio Bay system. Freshwater inflow is necessary to keep the salinity within a range that will support a healthy estuarine and marine environment and to provide critical nutrients and sediments. Without the freshwater inflow, the bay system would become too saline to serve as a nursery area for the spawning of the numerous commercial and recreational species dependent on it. Similarly, without the nutrients and sediments carried by those inflows, the food chain of the bay would collapse. The recreational and commercial fishing industries in the bays supported by inflow from the Guadalupe River have an estimated economic value of $575 million dollars a year. Other natural resource-related tourist activities, such as bird watching and particularly viewing the endangered whooping cranes, also add millions to the local economies around the bay. All of those activities depend on fish and wildlife populations that, in turn, depend on a sufficient amount of freshwater making it to the bay at the right time of the year via the Guadalupe River. 1 Reduction in inflow to San Antonio Bay could also adversely impact the Mission and Aransas Bays, which are hydrologically connected to San Antonio Bay. This proposed project could dramatically reduce flows to the bay during dry periods. In many years, there might be enough flow to allow for project diversions while also maintaining a healthy estuarine system. In dry or drought years, there are no adequate protections in place to maintain a level of flow to the bay which ensures ecological health. Groundwater Withdrawals In order to attain the 94,500 acre-feet of water for San Antonio with greater reliability, the project proposes to pump groundwater from the Gulf Coast aquifer to supplement surface water supplies. Landowners and ranchers in the lower Guadalupe region have expressed concern over the proposed "conjunctive use" of groundwater in this project. When withdrawals from aquifers are made in excess of recharge (also referred to as "aquifer mining"), the levels in the aquifer drop, making it more costly and difficult for local landowners and farmers to get the water from their wells. The long-term average amount of groundwater to be withdrawn is 14,196 acre-feet per year, but withdrawals could range from 0 to 41,376 acre-feet per year. In response to the concerns associated with the development of additional groundwater supplies in this aquifer, the GBRA has developed a Groundwater Policy that will be used to guide the development of groundwater resources. Off-channel Reservoirs The capturing of river flows to be stored in off-channel reservoirs has an additional set of environmental concerns associated with it. There is potential for localized impacts at the two-20,000 acre off-channel reservoirs sites. Furthermore, reduction of inflow of freshwater to the bay could greatly reduce nutrient inputs to the estuary, limiting the productivity of the system. Also, reduced freshwater inflow, especially in dry times, will drive salinity levels up in the bay, and could possibly weaken species dependent on a less saline environment for reproduction and growth . Compounding the situation, higher salinity levels provide better environments for the growth of certain parasitic organisms that attack traditionally harvested species. --------------------------------- 1 TPWD (2000). Citation. Project Specifics and Timeline Timeline The Project is projected to be online within the next 10 years. The GBRA has already submitted an application to the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) for new water rights to pump additional stream flow from the Guadalupe River. Project Specifics This project includes the following components:
Initial cost estimates for water from this agreement are approximately $900 per acre-foot. Other options, such as further water conservation efforts in the region, are estimated to only cost between $50 and $200 per acre-foot or water. Public Participation Contact us if you would like additional information or for suggestions on how you can become involved in this issue. For More Information Contact us at info@texaswatermatters.org or 1-800-919-9151. ![]() |
![]() |
![]()
|
![]() |